Issues †politics Essay

Boeing is atomic number 53 of the lands top hat known manuf playures of aircrafts and so is Northrop Grumman who atomic number 18 the manufacturers of the airbus (Online discussion Hour, 2008). These atomic number 18 two top brands who be obviously competing in other beas of product line and then any last that require them is trap to raise considerable heat. It should b famous that both argon American companies though Northrop Grumman is partly owned by a French gild.The nature of the incur which involves the security of America as a nation is a matter of home(a) concern as it involves the increase of structures that could take c are the growth of security arrangings. Boeing and Grumman existence moving in structures, such a gargantuan commutationise go away obviously attract the pursuance of stakeholders from both sides. There are a number of key issues that drive home been brought disc everywhere by the air force pledges which include host machine con tracts are a matter of common concern since it is in enjoin to cherish the public, the resources utilize in the soldiers contracts are derived from taxpayers and thitherfore the loser of such projects leading be a waste of taxpayers gold (Meyer, 2007). When McCain questi sensationd the cost durability in leasing planes that would otherwise curb no values when their take on period was over his motive as the senator of Alabama was to plug that the taxpayers money is channeled to recyclable projects.Furthermore, it is quite clear that the politicians apply the force to shoot down potential droply utilitarian deals verboten-of-pocket to what Northrop Grumman executives refer to as big-ticket(prenominal) lobbying. Politics is not of all time butt for there are situations where the stakes convoluted are shielded from the public and though the politics and viewpoints bequeath be demonstrable to suit the public, the real reasons are practically personal (Meyer, 2007 ). The inclusion of politics in such grammatical cases wherefore has both advantages and disadvantages and should be weighed carefully. forces procural just want any other public procurement scheme is prone to stainion, this was the case in the original contract that was brought to an end by Rumsfeld in 2006. Moreover, the big money touch in military procurement kneades act as a natural catalysts for corruption, therefore there is pauperization to come up with a robust self set brasss that will turn back that such wrong practices are not in leastways included in the procurement process, the sex act gum olibanum comes into the picture (Meyer, 2007).However, the governmental brass is not known for its objectivity. In the cases, whatever of the reasons brought out against Northrop Grumman are flimsy and neediness in objectivity. The fact that there will be lobbying is a clear squeeze that there will be bolshy in objectivity thus the decision will tend to favor gro ups that are be able to garner abundant political support in the congress. Furthermore, the political trunk is one of the intimately corrupt system there is and the rationale in placing such a system to retain against corruption is questionable. i.Security Military procurement is a security critical matter (Meyer, 2007).The military is in place to train that the US is protected against its external enemies (Meyer, 2007). The seriousness with which the equipment tendering process is treated and the keen eye that the media watches the blossom forth of such events relay the importance set on the military by the American commonwealth. The US is traditionally a battle nation and the effectiveness of its military and equipments is one of the factors that has cemented its place as a world power.Military activities require high levels of silence (Meyer, 2007). There is need to come up with effective equipments that can be used in varied situations. It should be noted that the argu ments brought forward by the executives from both sides are centered around the superiority of their products or the weaknesses of their opposite. The need for accuracy and comfortably real products that have the required story are some of the considerations that led to the two big companies making it to the final stage.The two companies are multinationals that have developed their brands all over the globe. It is note worthy that when the US defense deposit cancels Boeings leases other nations still sample their products and are continues seeking the products that have been label cost ineffective due to the re coiffureation associated with their brand name. The importance of the security system is seen in the number of avenues and legislative systems that have been retch in place to reckon that the process is done in a just manner (Krishnan, 2008).When the airforce declares that Northrop Grumman had won the bid for the airforce tankers, Boeing seeks redress by dint of a d ifferent avenue earth accountability character. The office looks at their complaints and decides to immobilise the process. It should be noted that it was the same office that had early in the decades frozen a billion dollar Boeing contract due to corruption charges. notwithstanding though there are systems put in place to ensure proper procedures in procurement of run and services, they can be outdone slow (Krishnan, 2008).The corruption allegations made in the sign Boeing contracts are a clear case where the protocols were overridden and it only came to realization a pair off of months after the contracts had been signed. Furthermore, the fact that is was later install out that a different visualize could meet the specifications made by the airforce with reduced costs clearly suggest that even though the guidelines are put in place they are rarely detected thus the need for a system or authority that will follow up on the recommendations and processes to ensure that t hey line up to the laid out guidelines.Some politicians have argued that the French affiliation of the airbus manufacturer is in itself a security risk and therefore a purely American company should be contracted. However, such a detection systems will obviously hire out other capable companies and therefore tote up about(predicate) questions on the integrity of the instruction process. America has prided itself as cosmos a liberalized nation, putting up measures that will lock out other qualified members on the basis of the compositions of its investors is contrary to the spirit of liberalization.Furthermore, existence involved with a company that has mateed with a success story in europium shields the tanker project from American economical down cadences though it effectively ensures that the project is touch on by the happening in Europe. It is surreal to lobby for Boeing on the basis of confidentiality a company that has already shown traces of corruption cannot be trusted and n both can a company that is yet to prove its worth in the military sector.Therefore, system should be put in place to ensure that the projects are monitored and compared to some given standards if either is to be awarded the contract. ii. Stability The US is the suffer of capitalism and is therefore a unpolished that is characterized by intense competition surrounded by industry players who will always be on the look for additional monetary resource that will ensure their development into the time to come (Verkuil, 2007). On the day it was reported that Northrop Grumman had won the military contracts its make do prices rose by over 20 cents and Boeings shares skin by a couple of cents (CBS news program, 2008).Note, the development in the contract procurement were being watched by investors who will then gain their decisions on which company to invest in. Even though the large money involved in the transactions whitethorn be sufficiency to lure investors into cha nneling their resources to a ill-tempered company, the repute involved in being a company contracted with one of the worlds best airforce to develop its aircraft tankers is enough to cause pregnant changes in the companys share index. Being a capitalistic providence where entities gain at the expense of others, Boeing is bound to feel the pinch.The situation is made worsened by the consideration that Boeing has a salubrious developed reputation and therefore failure to win a contract from a partner that it has associated with for a long time may be taken by the investors and its consumers in the wrong light. It may involve that the partner does not trust its force to develop superiors products or has doubts on its potential to remain productive. To bring the idea of reputation into perspective, many are of the notion that the corruptions charges brought against Boeing may have affected its chances of successfully statement for the contract (Verkuil, 2007).This holds considera ble weight in that the military is not all about facilities but also reputation. The American people and its enemies will always keep a keen eye on the military and any transactions conducted with a partner who is proved to be corrupt will dent on its integrity thus its reputation. Conclusion Awarding a contract to a company to deliver services that are of public take is a complex process and will always involve the media and many other systems that have been put in place to ensure the safety of the public.Individual good and interest will always be central in the arguments brought forward by most people, this is more pronounced if the contract will significantly affect many people. It is therefore upon the government and the social systems to ensure that the systems put in place to ensure effectiveness of the bidding process are mental process properly and are robust enough to deal with the dynamism associated with such processes. If need be, changes must be instituted to ensure that the system are functioning.The products delivered must measure up to some predetermined standards to ensure persona and accountability. These measures and other quality management measures if well integrated into the bidding and implementation of contracts that are of public interest will ensure that the public benefits in the best possible way.Word Count 3271 ,Reference List CBS red-hots (2008). Boeing Spurned On Huge denude Force Contract. Retrieved 13 October 2008 from Krishnan, A. (2008). War as Business Technological Change and Military Service Contracting. Aldershot Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. Meyer, J. (2007). Working in a War Zone Military Contractors. New York The Rosen Publishing Group. Online News Hour (2008). Boeing, Northrop Grumman coming upon Over Tanker Contract.Retrieved 13 October 2008 from unify States Government Accountability Office (2008). rumor Regarding the Bid differ Decision resolving power the Aerial Refueling Tanker Protest by The Boeing Comp any. Retrieved 13 October 2008 from Verkuil, R. (2007). Outsourcing Sovereignty why Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy and what We Can Do about it. New York Cambridge University Press.